Legality of Service Animals

Unfortunately, some individuals are asking whether “service animal” laws are being abused by those who want to rip-off the system.

There have been newspaper article, articles, viewpoint pieces and other editorials where individuals rant and complain about individuals they think to be abusing the system. You hear some complain that they had to sit near a dog at a restaurant that they don’t believe is a “genuine” service canine, or others complain that their next-door neighbors have a pet in a “no family pet” structure because they declared the animal is an emotional support animal.

Some of the commentary has an upset tone, and some people are downright upset.

How does this impact those who legally own and use a service animal to better their lives? In numerous ways.

For one, it can it more difficult to navigate administration of the world when your claim of an impairment and your service or emotional support animal’s status is questioned. If a property owner or entrepreneur has actually heard unfavorable stories declaring that some individuals are abusing the system, it can trigger them to look suspiciously at all plaintiffs.

Some property owner and company owner have started asking for proof of status, even though requesting composed or other proof is not constantly legal, and despite the fact that many owners of legitimate service animals and emotional support animals have actually not taken advantage of registering them, and thus have no such documentation to produce.

It is the suspicious attitude and unlawful demands of some landlords and business owners that make registrations services like the Service Animal Registry of California so vital to legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can help shortcut the real estate leasing and company gain access to concerns when the owner can produce an easy file that will frequently satisfy the owner or property manager. Also, when utilizing public spaces, it is frequently easier to turn over a file with a simple sentence stating, “This is a service animal” and letting the other party read the information, instead of having a long-winded drawn-out discussion (or worse yet, argument) in public, with observers listening in and gathering around the conversation.

So, do some people rip-off the system, or video game the law? Unfortunately, the response is “probably yes.” In life, there is always space for abuse and individuals can attempt to make the most of lots of systems that we as a society put in place to safeguard the rights of those who need such protection. For instance, numerous motorists incorrectly display handicapped parking placards to take advantage of complimentary and practical parking. Not to mention the number of folks who push their tax returns, claim inappropriate tax reductions, abuse retailer return policies, or do other bad acts.

However that percentage of abuse, which in the location of service animal laws is ideally small, is perhaps a very small rate to pay when compared to the greater goal of promoting access and equality for all.

In the end, you can not manage any system to make it 100% abuse evidence. So enduring the few people who fraud service animal laws is the cost we gladly pay to ensure that the handicapped in the terrific state of California have equivalent gain access to under law.

error: Content is protected !!